Re: Ada Component Registry proposal
From: Robert I. Eachus (rieachus_at_comcast.net)
Date: 10/26/03
- Next message: Dirk Craeynest: "FINAL CfPapers, Reliable Software Technologies, Ada-Europe 2004"
- Previous message: Demetrius Maldonado: "reanbnvqijf"
- In reply to: sk: "Re: Ada Component Registry proposal"
- Next in thread: chris: "Re: Ada Component Registry proposal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:11:45 GMT
sk wrote:
> Sorry, breaking my intentions. In case you havn't included a
> "field" for dependencies, you probably need to. For example,
> the OpenGL binding depends on AdaBindX.
Right now I have a Requires entry that can include other projects,
compilers, Ada versions, hardware or operating systems. It will
probably get expanded a bit to allow for bindings to non-Ada code to say
what they bind to. (Or that may end up as a different type of entry.
"Binds to" perhaps?)
There is also a category Supports which is similar but different in
intent. If software has been ported to several compilers or several
operating systems, this allows documentation of what versions are known
to be supported.
--
Robert I. Eachus
"Quality is the Buddha. Quality is scientific reality. Quality is the
goal of Art. It remains to work these concepts into a practical,
down-to-earth context, and for this there is nothing more practical or
down-to-earth than what I have been talking about all along...the repair
of an old motorcycle." -- from Zen and the Art of Motorcycle
Maintenance by Robert Pirsig
- Next message: Dirk Craeynest: "FINAL CfPapers, Reliable Software Technologies, Ada-Europe 2004"
- Previous message: Demetrius Maldonado: "reanbnvqijf"
- In reply to: sk: "Re: Ada Component Registry proposal"
- Next in thread: chris: "Re: Ada Component Registry proposal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|