Re: "continue/next" for "loop"
From: sk (noname_at_myob.com)
Date: 11/05/03
- Next message: Jeffrey Carter: "Re: Variant vs. Tagged Type"
- Previous message: Steve: "Re: socket, pipe"
- In reply to: Lutz Donnerhacke: ""continue/next" for "loop""
- Next in thread: Stephen Leake: "Re: "continue/next" for "loop""
- Reply: Stephen Leake: "Re: "continue/next" for "loop""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 09:54:44 -0600 To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
In an echo to my previous proposal for
raise <exception> when <boolean-condition>;
(which was generally rejected), how would Ada
users feel about a
goto <label> when <boolean-condition>;
statement ?
My position is again that of readability.
-- ------------------------------------------------- -- Merge vertically for real address -- -- s n p @ t . o -- k i e k c c m -------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Jeffrey Carter: "Re: Variant vs. Tagged Type"
- Previous message: Steve: "Re: socket, pipe"
- In reply to: Lutz Donnerhacke: ""continue/next" for "loop""
- Next in thread: Stephen Leake: "Re: "continue/next" for "loop""
- Reply: Stephen Leake: "Re: "continue/next" for "loop""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]