Re: "continue/next" for "loop"
From: Jeffrey Carter (spam_at_spam.com)
Date: 11/07/03
- Next message: sk: "C hazards at "The Register""
- Previous message: Andreas Almroth: "Re: gcc/gnat 3.3"
- In reply to: Charles Lindsey: "Re: "continue/next" for "loop""
- Next in thread: Jim Rogers: "Re: "continue/next" for "loop""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:34:47 GMT
Charles Lindsey wrote:
> I think "nested boxes" is the essential feature of _any_ structured
> programming, including Jackson's. Yes, it is a long time time I knew what
> Jackson's system was all about, but I do recall that it seemed to be a bit
> overhyped at the time.
No matter what you think about JSP, it's better than the method used by
98% of SW developers: sit down and start coding.
-- Jeff Carter "C's solution to this [variable-sized arrays] has real problems, and people who are complaining about safety definitely have a point." Dennis Ritchie 25
- Next message: sk: "C hazards at "The Register""
- Previous message: Andreas Almroth: "Re: gcc/gnat 3.3"
- In reply to: Charles Lindsey: "Re: "continue/next" for "loop""
- Next in thread: Jim Rogers: "Re: "continue/next" for "loop""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|