Re: ACM Ada Letters
From: Robert A Duff (bobduff_at_shell01.TheWorld.com)
Date: 11/07/03
- Next message: Simon Wright: "Re: Short circuit boolean evaluation"
- Previous message: Russ: "Re: Clause "with and use""
- In reply to: Marius Amado Alves: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Next in thread: Pat Rogers: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Reply: Pat Rogers: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Reply: Marius Amado Alves: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Reply: Marin David Condic: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 07 Nov 2003 16:11:08 -0500
Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> writes:
> ...to which I would add
>
> Fixed size font resembling Courier, Courier New
>
> for source code.
Why do we write and read source code in fixed-width fonts?
I usually do, and most folks do.
But variable width is certainly more readable.
For Russ: by "readable", I mean "easier to read".
Please don't call me an "idiot" for not being *able* to read
fixed-width fonts -- I just find variable-width fonts easier to read.
;-) ;-)
- Bob
- Next message: Simon Wright: "Re: Short circuit boolean evaluation"
- Previous message: Russ: "Re: Clause "with and use""
- In reply to: Marius Amado Alves: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Next in thread: Pat Rogers: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Reply: Pat Rogers: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Reply: Marius Amado Alves: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Reply: Marin David Condic: "Re: ACM Ada Letters"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|