comp.lang.ada
By Author

1129 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 12/31/03
Ending: 01/31/04

• Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/21/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/16/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/13/04)
• Abardeen
  • Re: Ada 83 to 95 (01/30/04)
  • Ada 83 to 95 (01/29/04)
• Adam Beneschan
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/15/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/09/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/09/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/08/04)
  • Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/08/04)
• Adrian Knoth
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/22/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/17/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/15/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/14/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/14/04)
• Albert van der Horst
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/16/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/16/04)
• Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
  • Re: Nature of XML (was: Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor) (01/31/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/31/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: Nature of XML (was: Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor) (01/30/04)
  • Re: Ada & Builder (01/30/04)
  • Nature of XML (was: Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor) (01/29/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions + object notation (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/28/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/26/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/26/04)
  • Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/26/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/25/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/24/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/23/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/15/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/13/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (was: Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/07/04)
  • Re: Ada Letters (01/05/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/05/04)
  • Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/02/04)
• amado.alves
  • RE: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/23/04)
  • RE: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/22/04)
  • RE: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • RE: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • RE: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • RE: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • RE: The "()" operator revisited. (01/14/04)
  • RE: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • RE: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • RE: style Q: type .. is new String; (01/09/04)
  • RE: style Q: type .. is new String; (01/09/04)
  • RE: Problem whith objects, access and abstract tagged private types (01/08/04)
  • RE: URGENT: inserting words into an array (01/07/04)
• Andreas Almroth
  • Re: Gnat 3.14 for Solaris x86 (01/07/04)
  • Re: Q:Most reasonable OS Layer Access? (01/07/04)
• Autumn Armstrong
  • Best Source for V!agra (01/29/04)
• Baris Gokbudak
  • How to calculate optimum task size? (01/04/04)
• Ben Horowitz
  • Gnat and multiple naming conventions (01/30/04)
  • Compilation error with GNAT (01/28/04)
• Betsy Orr
  • Re: PWDTCUEM, been pasted over (01/04/04)
• Bill Ward
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Differentation in Ada? (01/22/04)
  • Differentation in Ada? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/22/04)
  • Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/21/04)
• Blanchard Ethan
  • Re: INQMML, little cloud came (01/28/04)
• Bower
  • Re: TVZURU, if you dont (01/02/04)
• Bruno
  • Problem whith objects, access and abstract tagged private types (01/08/04)
• bud davis
  • SIGRTMIN, where is it defined ? (01/09/04)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
• Cecilia Chew
  • Problem from a Newbie (01/13/04)
• Chad R. Meiners
  • Re: Blinking text (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: ADA Windows IDE (01/18/04)
  • Re: ADA Windows IDE (01/18/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/12/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
• chris
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
• christoph.grein_at_eurocopter.com
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/09/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/09/04)
• Christopher Browne
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/17/04)
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/16/04)
• Church
  • Re: CF, as she flew (01/16/04)
• cl1
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: issue with implementing a visitor design pattern (01/18/04)
  • issue with implementing a visitor design pattern (01/15/04)
• Cordero Jasper
  • Re: MUKPU, and your little (01/21/04)
• Craig Carey
  • Re: Ann: 2 Ada apps (01/22/04)
  • Re: To raise an exception in task and handle/catch it in outer-block. (01/10/04)
  • Re: URGENT: inserting words into an array (01/10/04)
  • Re: URGENT: inserting words into an array (01/10/04)
• Dale Stanbrough
  • Re: issue with implementing a visitor design pattern (01/24/04)
• Dan Eilers
  • Re: Ada 83 to 95 (01/30/04)
  • Re: Compilation error with GNAT (01/29/04)
  • Re: Compilation error with GNAT (01/29/04)
• Dave Hansen
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/05/04)
• Dave Thompson
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (was: Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/23/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/07/04)
• david
  • Re: gnat and winspool.lib (01/29/04)
  • Re: gnat and winspool.lib (01/29/04)
  • gnat and winspool.lib (01/28/04)
• David C. Hoos
  • Re: Differentation in Ada? (01/22/04)
  • Re: www.ada-ware.com (01/21/04)
  • Re: Problem from a Newbie (01/13/04)
  • Re: LoadLibrary problem (01/12/04)
  • Re: SIGRTMIN, where is it defined ? (01/09/04)
  • Re: SIGRTMIN, where is it defined ? (01/09/04)
• David Marceau
  • Re: CString (01/19/04)
  • Re: ADA vs JAVA sockets (01/08/04)
• David Starner
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
• Dirk Craeynest
  • POSIX-Ada standard - IEEE reaffirmation vote (01/24/04)
• Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions + object notation (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: MS Access (01/28/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/28/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: issue with implementing a visitor design pattern (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/26/04)
  • Re: issue with implementing a visitor design pattern (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/22/04)
  • Re: Help Ada basics (01/21/04)
  • Re: Redefining := (was: The "()" operator revisited.) (01/19/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/19/04)
  • Re: ANN: Simple components v 1.3 (01/16/04)
  • Re: ANN: Simple components v 1.3 (01/15/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/15/04)
  • Re: Problem from a Newbie (01/15/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/15/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/14/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/14/04)
  • Re: ANN: Simple components v 1.3 (01/14/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/14/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/14/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/09/04)
  • Re: Problem whith objects, access and abstract tagged private types (01/08/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/07/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/06/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/06/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/05/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/04/04)
  • Re: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (01/04/04)
  • ANN: Simple components v 1.3 (01/03/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/03/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/02/04)
• Dmytry Lavrov
  • Re: "everybody in the control room is using Java" (01/17/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/17/04)
  • Cg , GLHS - ada-like languages with C sintax ? (01/05/04)
• Dr Steve Sangwine
  • Re: www.ada-ware.com (01/23/04)
• Duncan Sands
  • Re: CString (01/18/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/16/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/16/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/16/04)
  • Re: style Q: type .. is new String; (01/09/04)
  • Re: Gnat 3.15p bugs (was: ADA vs JAVA sockets) (01/08/04)
  • Re: Gnat 3.15p bugs (was: ADA vs JAVA sockets) (01/08/04)
  • Re: ADA vs JAVA sockets (01/07/04)
  • Re: ADA vs JAVA sockets (01/07/04)
  • glade (distributed systems) that works with gcc-3.4 (CVS)? (01/02/04)
• Ed Falis
  • Re: On-line Ada Language Reference Manual (01/22/04)
  • Re: How to calculate optimum task size? (01/05/04)
• Ekkehard Morgenstern
  • Re: Ada IDE [was: what about having ada compile ada on the fly?] (01/04/04)
• Elliott
  • Re: ZXTTJME, candles are already (01/16/04)
• Eric Merritt
  • Re: Ada, XML and M$ Patents (01/24/04)
• Erlo Haugen
  • Re: "everybody in the control room is using Java" (01/19/04)
• Evangelista Sami
  • protected objects and external call (01/22/04)
• Everett M. Greene
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
• fdebruin
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/26/04)
• Florian Weimer
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
• Francois G. Dorais
  • IEEE 754 (01/16/04)
• Frank
  • Re: To raise an exception in task and handle/catch it in outer-block. (01/10/04)
  • Re: To raise an exception in task and handle/catch it in outer-block. (01/07/04)
  • Re: To raise an exception in task and handle/catch it in outer-block. (01/04/04)
  • To raise an exception in task and handle/catch it in outer-block. (01/04/04)
• Frank J. Lhota
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: CString (01/18/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/16/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/16/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/12/04)
  • The "()" operator revisited. (01/12/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Where to start? (01/07/04)
  • Re: Q:Most reasonable OS Layer Access? (01/07/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/07/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/06/04)
  • Re: playing sound files (01/03/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/02/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/02/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/02/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (12/31/03)
• Frode Tennebø
  • Re: ADA vs JAVA sockets (01/07/04)
• Georg Bauhaus
  • Re: GLADE, Linux Kernel Modules etc, (01/31/04)
  • Re: Nature of XML (ramblings) (01/31/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/31/04)
  • Re: Nature of XML (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: Nature of XML (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (conclusions) (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/22/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/22/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/22/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/21/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/20/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: IEEE 754 (01/17/04)
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/17/04)
  • somewhat OT: another source of errors (01/16/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/15/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/15/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/15/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/15/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/15/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/15/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/12/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/12/04)
  • Re: Servo-Motor Controllers and other Low-Level Boards (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Problem whith objects, access and abstract tagged private types (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
• Gerry Rivera
  • Re: LVBUSV, and smiled some (01/30/04)
• gilmour
  • Is it possible to work connect from Ada to MySQL on Windows? (01/05/04)
  • Re: Access check failed (01/04/04)
  • Access check failed (01/03/04)
• Gioia Tauro
  • Use of Ada in the NIF (01/30/04)
• Hans-Bernhard Broeker
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
• Hetman
  • Re: playing sound files (01/03/04)
  • Re: playing sound files (01/03/04)
  • playing sound files (01/03/04)
• Hoskins Rory
  • Re: CKMDQIPI, immediately spun away (01/19/04)
• Hyman Rosen
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/28/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/28/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/23/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/18/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • "everybody in the control room is using Java" (01/16/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/16/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/14/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/07/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
  • Re: Ada Letters (01/06/04)
  • Re: SIGada Conference (01/05/04)
  • Re: Ada Letters (01/05/04)
  • Re: Ada Letters (01/05/04)
  • Re: Ada Letters (01/05/04)
  • Ada Letters (01/04/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/02/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/02/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/01/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (12/31/03)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (12/31/03)
• ilo
  • ADA Windows IDE (01/17/04)
• Isaac Gouy
  • Ada Generics Ignored (01/06/04)
• Jacob Sparre Andersen
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/29/04)
• James E. Hopper
  • Re: Ada & Builder (01/30/04)
• James Rogers
  • Re: protected type question (01/04/04)
• Jano
  • Re: MS Access (01/28/04)
  • Re: Problem with large constant array (Gnat 3.15p) (01/26/04)
  • Problem with large constant array (Gnat 3.15p) (01/26/04)
  • [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/26/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: Gnat 3.15p bugs (was: ADA vs JAVA sockets) (01/08/04)
  • Gnat 3.15p bugs (was: ADA vs JAVA sockets) (01/08/04)
  • Re: ADA vs JAVA sockets (01/07/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
• Jared Coates
  • Re: ASVFQGK, rimsky suddenly reached (01/30/04)
• jaturong
  • how to linking dll file (01/12/04)
• Jean-Pierre Rosen
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/23/04)
  • Re: protected objects and external call (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Where is C2Ada? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: protected objects and external call (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/22/04)
  • Where is C2Ada? (01/22/04)
  • Press release: Adalog agreed ACAL (01/16/04)
  • Re: Problem from a Newbie (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
  • Re: SIGada Conference (01/05/04)
• Jeff C,
  • Re: Free cryptographic library for Ada? (01/31/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/19/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/16/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/15/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/15/04)
  • Re: How to calculate optimum task size? (01/05/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
• Jeffrey Carter
  • Re: Free cryptographic library for Ada? (01/31/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: Ada 83 to 95 (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Endian-Independent Rep Clauses (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Endian-Independent Rep Clauses (was: Standard Ada Preprocessor) (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/22/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: generic parameter to generic package (01/20/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/17/04)
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/16/04)
  • Redefining := (was: The "()" operator revisited.) (01/16/04)
  • Re: ANN: Simple components v 1.3 (01/15/04)
  • Re: Problem from a Newbie (01/15/04)
  • Re: Problem from a Newbie (01/14/04)
  • Re: Problem from a Newbie (01/13/04)
  • Re: Problem whith objects, access and abstract tagged private types (01/08/04)
• Jeffrey Creem
  • Ada Programmer(s) - Southern New Hampshire, USA (01/23/04)
• Jerry Petrey
  • Re: the history of Ada (01/28/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Rover (01/22/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Where to start? (01/07/04)
• Jerry van Dijk
  • Re: gnat and winspool.lib (01/29/04)
• Jill
  • Modern way of losing hereto we;ght natural crazes (01/14/04)
• Joachim Schröer
  • Re: Incremental statistics functions (01/27/04)
• John R. Strohm
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
• John Woodruff
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/23/04)
  • Re: gps-1.4.0-academic issue (01/04/04)
• Jorge Real
  • Re: GLADE, Linux Kernel Modules etc, (01/27/04)
• Julius Rivers
  • Re: WM, and lindens rustled (01/20/04)
• Karl Adair
  • Re: ZH, they were just (01/16/04)
• Katy
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/12/04)
• Keith Thompson
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/06/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/05/04)
• Kelly Hall
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
• Ken O. Burtch
  • ANN: BUSH 0.9.3 (01/01/04)
• Kenneth Almquist
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
• Kevin Simonson
  • On-line Ada Language Reference Manual (01/22/04)
• Larry Hazel
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
• Larry Kilgallen
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/26/04)
  • Re: OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled (01/22/04)
  • Re: OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled (01/22/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
• Leanna Matthews
  • Re: IXUCJ, with his left (01/28/04)
• Leif Roar Moldskred
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
• Leon Winslow
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
• Lionel.DRAGHI_at_fr.thalesgroup.com
  • RE: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/26/04)
  • RE: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/26/04)
• Lorrie Hellier
  • MS Access (01/28/04)
• Ludovic Brenta
  • Re: gnat and winspool.lib (01/29/04)
  • Re: Import C... Works!! but how does it work :/ (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
  • Re: Binding and linking non-withed packages into an executable (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/27/04)
  • Re: Import C (01/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/26/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
• Luke A. Guest
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: ADA Windows IDE (01/18/04)
  • Re: CString (01/18/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/02/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/02/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/02/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/02/04)
  • [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/02/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/02/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/02/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/01/04)
  • Enumeration representation (01/01/04)
  • Re: Address representation clause is getting 0 (01/01/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
  • Re: Address representation clause is getting 0 (01/01/04)
• Lutz Donnerhacke
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (conclusions) (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (conclusions) (01/30/04)
• Marc A. Criley
  • Binding and linking non-withed packages into an executable (01/27/04)
• Marin David Condic
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/31/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/31/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/31/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (conclusions) (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (conclusions) (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/25/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/25/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/23/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/23/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/22/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/22/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/22/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/22/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/22/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/21/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/19/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/19/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • In-Out Parameters for functions (was: Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/07/04)
  • Re: Ada Letters (01/05/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/03/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/02/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/02/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/01/04)
• Marius Amado Alves
  • Re: Nature of XML (ramblings) (01/31/04)
  • Re: Nature of XML (01/30/04)
  • Re: Ada 83 to 95 (01/30/04)
• Mark A. Biggar
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/16/04)
• Mark H Johnson
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/21/04)
  • Re: gnat/linux:setitimer (01/05/04)
• Mark Lorenzen
  • Re: www.ada-ware.com (01/19/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/19/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: SIGRTMIN, where is it defined ? (01/09/04)
• Martin Dowie
  • Re: gnat and winspool.lib (01/28/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/23/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/17/04)
  • Re: "everybody in the control room is using Java" (01/17/04)
  • Re: "everybody in the control room is using Java" (01/16/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/07/04)
  • Re: Q:Most reasonable OS Layer Access? (01/07/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
• Martin Krischik
  • [Announcement] AdaCL 4.0.1 released. (01/31/04)
  • Re: [Announcement] AdaCL 4.0.0 (cgi) released. (01/22/04)
  • [Announcement] AdaCL 4.0.0 (cgi) released. (01/21/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/12/04)
  • Re: Where to start? (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Where to start? (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/07/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/06/04)
• Mats Karlssohn
  • Re: OT: Incremental statistics functions (01/28/04)
  • OT: Incremental statistics functions (01/26/04)
• Mats Weber
  • Re: ANN: Simple components v 1.3 (01/15/04)
  • Re: ANN: Simple components v 1.3 (01/15/04)
• Mayer
  • Re: HV, tincture of valerian (01/22/04)
• mcslemon
  • Exit using Return Key (01/06/04)
• Mel Wilson
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/12/04)
• Melanie
  • Re: BVHOFYZY, many hanging about (01/11/04)
• Michael Bode
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/31/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
• Michael Erdmann
  • Re: Q:Most reasonable OS Layer Access? (01/08/04)
  • Re: Q:Most reasonable OS Layer Access? (01/07/04)
  • Q:Most reasonable OS Layer Access? (01/07/04)
  • Re: GNADE insert problem (01/01/04)
• Mike Brenner
  • Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/26/04)
• mla154
  • Re: Get_Immediate (01/23/04)
• Morin Brandie
  • Re: TJ, suddenly added unexpectedly: (01/27/04)
• Morse
  • Re: LDFNUK, professor even knew (01/18/04)
• Mr. J.
  • Re: generic procedure with a generic package as generic parameter (01/23/04)
  • Re: Help Ada basics (01/22/04)
  • generic procedure with a generic package as generic parameter (01/20/04)
  • generic parameter to generic package (01/20/04)
• Nando
  • Re: Import C... Works!! but how does it work :/ (01/28/04)
  • Re: Import C (01/27/04)
  • Re: Import C (01/27/04)
  • Import C (01/26/04)
• Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/26/04)
  • Re: "everybody in the control room is using Java" (01/19/04)
  • Re: More details on:--- ADA vs JAVA sockets--- (01/09/04)
• Pascal Obry
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Where to start? (01/11/04)
  • Re: URGENT: inserting words into an array (01/07/04)
  • Re: ADA vs JAVA sockets (01/07/04)
  • Re: gps-1.4.0-academic issue (01/04/04)
  • Re: Ada IDE [was: what about having ada compile ada on the fly?] (01/04/04)
  • Re: Ada IDE [was: what about having ada compile ada on the fly?] (01/03/04)
  • Re: gps-1.4.0-academic issue (01/03/04)
  • Re: Other Ada Standards (was Re: SIGada Conference) (01/03/04)
• Pat Rogers
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/16/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/02/04)
• Per Sandberg
  • Re: Compilation error with GNAT (01/29/04)
  • Re: function from dll (01/23/04)
  • Re: ADA Windows IDE (01/17/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/02/04)
• Peter Amey
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/12/04)
• Peter C. Chapin
  • Re: Free cryptographic library for Ada? (01/31/04)
  • Free cryptographic library for Ada? (01/31/04)
• Peter Hermann
  • Re: Where is C2Ada? (01/22/04)
• Peter Richtmyer
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/26/04)
• Pjohnson
  • nesws regarding vigros devolve (01/22/04)
• Praxis
  • Modern way of losing hereto we;ght natural crazes (01/14/04)
• Preben Randhol
  • Re: Nature of XML (was: Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor) (01/31/04)
  • Re: Free cryptographic library for Ada? (01/31/04)
  • Re: Nature of XML (was: Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor) (01/30/04)
  • Re: Nature of XML (was: Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor) (01/30/04)
  • Re: Ada & Builder (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: the history of Ada (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/26/04)
  • Re: Ada, XML and M$ Patents (01/24/04)
  • Ada, XML and M$ Patents (01/24/04)
  • Re: generic procedure with a generic package as generic parameter (01/24/04)
  • Re: [Announcement] AdaCL 4.0.0 (cgi) released. (01/23/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/23/04)
  • Re: [Announcement] AdaCL 4.0.0 (cgi) released. (01/22/04)
  • Re: OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled (01/22/04)
  • Re: Any ADA NASA Developer's out there? (01/22/04)
  • Re: www.ada-ware.com (01/22/04)
  • Re: OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled (01/22/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/19/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/19/04)
  • Re: "everybody in the control room is using Java" (01/19/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: "everybody in the control room is using Java" (01/17/04)
  • Re: ANN: Simple components v 1.3 (01/14/04)
• Qas
  • weird compilation error... (01/08/04)
  • URGENT: inserting words into an array (01/07/04)
• Rafal 'Raf256' Maj
  • Where to start? (01/07/04)
• Randy Brukardt
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/31/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/25/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/22/04)
  • www.ada-ware.com (01/21/04)
  • Re: OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled (01/21/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/17/04)
  • Re: Redefining := (was: The "()" operator revisited.) (01/16/04)
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/16/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/09/04)
  • Re: Ada Letters (01/06/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/06/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/06/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/02/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/02/04)
  • Re: Address representation clause is getting 0 (12/31/03)
• Ratson Janiv
  • Help Ada basics (01/20/04)
• Reid Duran
  • Aa, ddullt movie stars Ceecrut for fame ! (01/16/04)
• Riccardo
  • thanks (01/09/04)
  • Re: More details on:--- ADA vs JAVA sockets--- (01/09/04)
  • More details on:--- ADA vs JAVA sockets--- (01/08/04)
  • ADA vs JAVA sockets (01/07/04)
• Richards
  • nesws regarding vigros devolve (01/22/04)
• Robert A Duff
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/28/04)
  • Re: Binding and linking non-withed packages into an executable (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/26/04)
  • Re: issue with implementing a visitor design pattern (01/26/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/24/04)
  • Re: issue with implementing a visitor design pattern (01/24/04)
  • Re: protected objects and external call (01/23/04)
  • Re: protected objects and external call (01/23/04)
  • Re: protected objects and external call (01/22/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/22/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/22/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/21/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/19/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/19/04)
  • Re: issue with implementing a visitor design pattern (01/17/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/17/04)
  • Re: GC, existed? the foreigner (01/16/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/16/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/16/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/15/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/15/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/13/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/12/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (was: Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: style Q: type .. is new String; (01/09/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/09/04)
  • Re: weird compilation error... (01/08/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/08/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/08/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/03/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/03/04)
  • Re: Enumeration representation (01/02/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/02/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (12/31/03)
• Robert C. Leif
  • Assert pragma (01/23/04)
  • Rover (01/22/04)
  • Re: GUI (01/21/04)
  • Re: GUI (01/21/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: Servo-Motor Controllers and other Low-Level Boards (01/11/04)
  • Servo-Motor Controllers and other Low-Level Boards (01/10/04)
• Robert I. Eachus
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/31/04)
  • Re: Nature of XML (01/31/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/31/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/31/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/30/04)
  • Re: Use of Ada in the NIF (01/30/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Incremental statistics functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: OT: Incremental statistics functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: Endian-Independent Rep Clauses (01/27/04)
  • Re: Endian-Independent Rep Clauses (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/26/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/25/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/25/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ? (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/24/04)
  • Re: Help Ada basics (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/23/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (Was: why ada is so unpopular ?) (01/22/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/22/04)
  • Re: generic parameter to generic package (01/20/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/20/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/18/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/17/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/17/04)
  • Re: The "()" operator revisited. (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/17/04)
  • Re: issue with implementing a visitor design pattern (01/17/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/14/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/12/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/12/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/11/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/10/04)
  • Re: To raise an exception in task and handle/catch it in outer-block. (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/10/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/09/04)
  • Re: style Q: type .. is new String; (01/09/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/09/04)
  • Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/07/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/07/04)
  • Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? (01/06/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/05/04)
  • Re: How to calculate optimum task size? (01/05/04)
  • Re: protected type question (01/04/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/04/04)
  • Re: Mutable parameter of a function (long ago was: Re: What evil would happen?) (01/03/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
• Robert Spooner
  • Re: thanks (01/09/04)
• Rod Chapman
  • ANN: XP and Static Verification paper from SIGAda now on-line (01/14/04)
• Ronald Dauster
  • Re:was: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: ARM equivalents for C++ and Java (01/18/04)
• Root
  • cheeap sooftware avaailable ! oglbyfs (01/02/04)
• Scott Moore
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
  • Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems (01/08/04)
• Sebastian D.B. Krause
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
• shoko
  • protected type question (01/03/04)
• Simon Wright
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Compilation error with GNAT (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/27/04)
  • Re: Problem from a Newbie (01/14/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/04/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
• sk
  • Re: Free cryptographic library for Ada? (01/31/04)
  • Re: GLADE, Linux Kernel Modules etc, (01/30/04)
  • GLADE, Linux Kernel Modules etc, (01/22/04)
  • Re: SIGRTMIN, where is it defined ? (01/09/04)
  • Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? (01/03/04)
• smm
  • hala (01/28/04)
• Stefano M.
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/15/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/15/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/15/04)
  • Re: Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/14/04)
  • Gnat's Ada.Float_Text_IO.Put problem (01/14/04)
• Steffen Huber
  • Re: somewhat OT: another source of errors (01/17/04)
• Stephane Richard
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/25/04)
  • Re: www.ada-ware.com (01/23/04)
  • Re: On-line Ada Language Reference Manual (01/22/04)
  • Re: why ada is so unpopular ? (01/18/04)
  • Re: Where to start? (01/07/04)
  • Re: How to calculate optimum task size? (01/05/04)
  • mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (01/03/04)
• Stephen Leake
  • Re: Update on Ada packages in Debian GNU/Linux (01/31/04)
  • Re: Gnat and multiple naming conventions (01/30/04)
  • Re: Ada & Builder (01/30/04)
  • Re: Import C... Works!! but how does it work :/ (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/29/04)
  • Re: MS Access (01/28/04)
  • Re: Binding and linking non-withed packages into an executable (01/28/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/28/04)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor (01/28/04)
  • Re: Binding and linking non-withed packages into an executable (01/28/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spirit - Software failure (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: Endian-Independent Rep Clauses (01/27/04)
  • Re: Endian-Independent Rep Clauses (01/27/04)
  • Re: In-Out Parameters for functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: OT: Incremental statistics functions (01/27/04)
  • Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ?