Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 02/06/04
- Next message: Luke A. Guest: "Re: KDevelop 3.0 released - was Ada popularity"
- Previous message: Victor Bazarov: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- In reply to: Larry Hazel: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Next in thread: Joona I Palaste: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Reply: Joona I Palaste: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 23:53:15 +0000 (UTC)
Larry Hazel wrote:
> Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> When I need a language that's easy to use and readable, I turn
>> directly to C. Don't let me stop you, though.
>>
>
> C? Easy to read? You have got to be kidding.
Compared to the other languages in this crosspost? Damn right it's easy to
read! :-)
I mean yes, okay, I know what you mean. Any sufficiently advanced IOCCC
entry is indistinguishable from line noise. But not /all/ C programs are
IOCCC entries!
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Luke A. Guest: "Re: KDevelop 3.0 released - was Ada popularity"
- Previous message: Victor Bazarov: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- In reply to: Larry Hazel: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Next in thread: Joona I Palaste: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Reply: Joona I Palaste: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
