Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language

From: Joona I Palaste (palaste_at_cc.helsinki.fi)
Date: 02/06/04 

Date: 6 Feb 2004 08:38:43 GMT

Richard Heathfield <dontmail@address.co.uk.invalid> scribbled the following
on comp.lang.c:
> Larry Hazel wrote:
>> Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
>>>
>>> When I need a language that's easy to use and readable, I turn
>>> directly to C. Don't let me stop you, though.
>>
>> C? Easy to read? You have got to be kidding.

> Compared to the other languages in this crosspost? Damn right it's easy to
> read! :-)

> I mean yes, okay, I know what you mean. Any sufficiently advanced IOCCC
> entry is indistinguishable from line noise. But not /all/ C programs are
> IOCCC entries!

I find C harder to read than Java, and easier to read than C++. I
don't know about Ada, as I've never seen it. But C and C++ are a
breeze compared to the likes of Perl, Python and Lisp. They look like
C looked while I was still a BASIC programmer: a random jumble of
punctuation marks. 

-- 
/-- Joona Palaste (palaste@cc.helsinki.fi) ------------- Finland --------\
\-- http://www.helsinki.fi/~palaste --------------------- rules! --------/
"Nothing lasts forever - so why not destroy it now?"
   - Quake

Relevant Pages