Re: Unified Ada library
From: Hyman Rosen (hyrosen_at_mail.com)
Date: 04/18/04
- Next message: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Previous message: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- In reply to: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Next in thread: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Reply: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Reply: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 03:08:56 GMT
Matthew Heaney wrote:
> Right now, I'm leaning towards (1). The thing I like about Charles is
> that it's a relatively pure port of the STL to Ada95. There are C++
> developers who think that the STL could only have been written in C++,
> and Charles is my argument that that claim is false.
Bravo. I hope you keep going with this. You will have to watch out for the
Ada people who hate and fear C++ and will seek to turn this library into
something that is more "like Ada" in their perception, and will thereby kill
it.
- Next message: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Previous message: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- In reply to: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Next in thread: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Reply: Matthew Heaney: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Reply: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Unified Ada library"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|