[OT] Right to use vs. sue (was: No call for Ada...)
From: amado.alves (amado.alves_at_netcabo.pt)
Date: 04/29/04
- Previous message: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: [OT] Right to use vs. sue (was: No call for Ada...)"
- Reply: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: [OT] Right to use vs. sue (was: No call for Ada...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:08:24 +0100 To: <comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
I like Kazakov's idea of, basically, selling warranty instead of bits.
However I see this problem: only BIG entities are capable of effectively providing warranty. So the model (if pushed by law) would put small developers out of business.
/* However I note that when a big company warrants some system (e.g. a airplane) that contains software, they are of necessity warranting the contained software,
parts of which might have been done by small companies. */
And why do you think the copyright system works poorly? Aren't zillions of creators living of them, some quite well? Why can't this work for software?
- Previous message: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: [OT] Right to use vs. sue (was: No call for Ada...)"
- Reply: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: [OT] Right to use vs. sue (was: No call for Ada...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]