Re: timeouts
tmoran_at_acm.org
Date: 08/27/04
- Previous message: Jeffrey Carter: "Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request"
- In reply to: Brian May: "Re: timeouts"
- Next in thread: Brian May: "Re: timeouts"
- Reply: Brian May: "Re: timeouts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:31:50 GMT
>In my case the solutions I have seen don't seem feasible:
Comparing my version of s-osprim.adb and the one from ACT, I note the
addition of one (initialization) line:
Comparing files S-OSPRIM.ADB and L:S-OSPRIM.ADB
***** S-OSPRIM.ADB
Long_Long_Float (Sec_Unit));
Base_Monotonic_Clock := Base_Clock;
end Get_Base_Time;
***** L:S-OSPRIM.ADB
Long_Long_Float (Sec_Unit));
end Get_Base_Time;
*****
***** S-OSPRIM.ADB
Of course you'll then need to compile s-osprim.adb with the compiler
option that lets to recompile system components (which I don't recall
off the top of my head) and you'll have to recompile the things that
depend on s-osprim.adb (IIRC that's more than you would expect).
Is the current GCC Gnat more robust than 3.15p, or is it still beta?
ie, should we (Windows) 3.15p users switch, or continue waiting?
- Previous message: Jeffrey Carter: "Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request"
- In reply to: Brian May: "Re: timeouts"
- Next in thread: Brian May: "Re: timeouts"
- Reply: Brian May: "Re: timeouts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|