Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development
From: Dan McLeran (dan.r.mcleran_at_seagate.com)
Date: 08/28/04
- Next message: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request"
- Previous message: Richard Riehle: "Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request"
- In reply to: Ludovic Brenta: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Next in thread: Ludovic Brenta: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Reply: Ludovic Brenta: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 28 Aug 2004 10:57:53 -0700
> Now you are talking about the tools, not the language. To be fair,
> please provide a similar assessment of tools (IDEs, GUI creation,
> etc.) for Eiffel.
If you read my post again, you'll see that I am contrasting GPS to
.Net, Eclipse, and Borland tools. The point I am trying to make is
that ACT is charging a fortune for a toolset that falls far short of
what other vendors are charging. IMO, the GPS and GtkAda tools are not
in the same league as .Net, Eclipse, JBuilder, others.
Of course, you are right in saying that one could write or use an
Eclipse plugin for Ada. My original post makes note of a plugin for
Eclipse that Aonix offers.
- Next message: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request"
- Previous message: Richard Riehle: "Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request"
- In reply to: Ludovic Brenta: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Next in thread: Ludovic Brenta: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Reply: Ludovic Brenta: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|