Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development
From: Dan McLeran (dan.r.mcleran_at_seagate.com)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: Hyman Rosen: "Re: Binding to feof"
- Previous message: Martin Krischik: "Re: [Announcement] AdaCL 4.2.0 released."
- In reply to: Ludovic Brenta: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Next in thread: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Reply: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Reply: Jeffrey Carter: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Aug 2004 10:06:58 -0700
> By contrast, .Net, Eclipse, JBuilder are mass-marketed to an audience
> of "coders", not "software engineers", to paraphrase Jeffrey Carter.
> I would also be curious what prices Microsoft, IBM and Borland charge
> for support contracts (as opposed to licenses) for .Net, Eclipse and
> JBuilder respectively.
Eclipse is free as well and I don't know if there are any companies
out there that sell support services (might not be a bad idea,
though). MS .Net and Borland tools and support contracts are not free.
>From my own research, they don't charge as much as ACT.
- Next message: Hyman Rosen: "Re: Binding to feof"
- Previous message: Martin Krischik: "Re: [Announcement] AdaCL 4.2.0 released."
- In reply to: Ludovic Brenta: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Next in thread: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Reply: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Reply: Jeffrey Carter: "Re: Feasibility of using Ada in new development"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
