Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)
From: Georg Bauhaus (sb463ba_at_l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de)
Date: 10/01/04
- Next message: Florian Weimer: "Re: gcc 3.4.2 Ada"
- Previous message: CBFalconer: "Re: Arch your code runs on?"
- In reply to: Kevin Cline: "Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)"
- Next in thread: K: "Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)"
- Reply: K: "Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:25:05 +0000 (UTC)
Kevin Cline <kevin.cline@gmail.com> wrote:
: Not much of a savings over simply writing
: separate create, read, and update functions for the record type.
Why are you so keen on savings?
-- Georg
- Next message: Florian Weimer: "Re: gcc 3.4.2 Ada"
- Previous message: CBFalconer: "Re: Arch your code runs on?"
- In reply to: Kevin Cline: "Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)"
- Next in thread: K: "Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)"
- Reply: K: "Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]