Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- From: Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler <nntp-2005-05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 06:38:29 +0000
Florian Weimer wrote:
> Mark is not using an Ada 95 compiler, it seems. It used to be more
> difficult because the size of the base type determined the number of
> stream elements used, and the representation clause doesn't change it.
Read again. He _changed_ the size of the base type. (Universal_Integer
doesn't have a fixed size, does it?)
Vinzent.
--
worst case: The wrong assumption there actually is one.
.
- References:
- Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- From: markp
- Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- From: Simon Wright
- Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- From: markp
- Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- From: Duncan Sands
- Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- From: markp
- Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- From: Simon Wright
- Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- From: Florian Weimer
- Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- Prev by Date: SWIG - Rod Kay
- Next by Date: workaround, was Re: Gnat STORAGE_ERROR
- Previous by thread: Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
- Next by thread: memory management
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|