Re: How difficult is ada to learn?
- From: "Gene" <eugene.ressler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2005 11:38:16 -0700
Thanks! You're absolutely right that sets are less of an issue than
strings. I overstated by saying "most people." My reference point is
undergrads in CS1, where small things can make a difference.
You perfectly illustrated what I meant. The overloaded plus
constructor is quite idiomatic. In Pascal, set construction just
happens. So students who know sets as an early exercise in Pascal do a
doubletake when they try the same in Ada. This mysterious-looking plus
pops up, and they must dig in to figure out operator overloading and
parameterized types in order to do what used to be self-evident. This
isn't a bad thing, but it does cause them to "miss" Pascal sets.
Best regards,
Gene
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How difficult is ada to learn?
- From: Matthew Heaney
- Re: How difficult is ada to learn?
- References:
- How difficult is ada to learn?
- From: Sm704
- Re: How difficult is ada to learn?
- From: Gene
- Re: How difficult is ada to learn?
- From: Matthew Heaney
- How difficult is ada to learn?
- Prev by Date: Two 'Output questions
- Next by Date: Re: Data table text I/O package?
- Previous by thread: Re: How difficult is ada to learn?
- Next by thread: Re: How difficult is ada to learn?
- Index(es):