Re: Two 'Output questions
- From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:08:16 -0500
"Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42C43B48.1040802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello everybody,
>
> a) Is there any guarantee that 'Output is implemented like...?
>
> 1. Write bounds/Tag
> 2. Call to 'Write
No, because it might be inherited (untagged types only) or redefined. But if
it is not, the default implementation is described by 13.13.2(25-27), and it
says the same as the above.
> I see that the containers provided with gnat gap 2005 have 'write
> redefined but not 'output. While I don't see reasons to use 'output on
> definite types (?), I'm guessing gnat does so because of a). I don't see
> any explanation in the RM, so if I'm right it may be still
> gnat-dependent. I suppose it's handy too to not have to redefine both
> 'Output and 'Write when the latter is enough.
Like I said, see 13.13.2(25-27).
> b) Is there any way to call the default 'Output attribute once you have
> redefined it? The reason for this is that I have a variant record in
> which just one of the variations needs special treatment... I have ideas
> for workarounds but I'm now just curious.
If the type is derived, you can call the operation of the parent type in the
obvious way. You might be able to rename the original operation before the
redefinition (the "squirreling away" type of rename, which certainly works
for overriding). But otherwise it is gone.
Randy.
.
- References:
- Two 'Output questions
- From: Alex R. Mosteo
- Two 'Output questions
- Prev by Date: Re: How difficult is ada to learn?
- Next by Date: Re: How to byte swap an IEEE Float?
- Previous by thread: Re: Two 'Output questions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
