comp.lang.ada
- Re: Enumeration literals and their associated functions
- Re: [OT] Administrator accounts (was: VMS DCL prompt)
- [OT] Administrator accounts (was: VMS DCL prompt)
- Re: Silly question about strings (was: Filenames in Ada)
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Ann: AdaWorld posting
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Silly question about strings (was: Filenames in Ada)
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- example of layered software?
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Counting Elements?
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- From: Harald Korneliussen
- Re: Silly question about strings (was: Filenames in Ada)
- Re: Silly question about strings (was: Filenames in Ada)
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Ada at FOSDEM 2006
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: Sequental IO and pointers
- Re: Sequental IO and pointers
- Re: Sequental IO and pointers
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: [OT] VMS DCL prompt, was: VMS ODS-5 filesystems, was: Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Sequental IO and pointers
- Sequental IO and pointers
- Re: Eclipse Ada Support - FYI
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: [OT] VMS ODS-5 filesystems, was: Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Eclipse Ada Support - FYI
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: [OT] VMS ODS-5 filesystems, was: Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: [OT] VMS ODS-5 filesystems, was: Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Counting Elements figured out.
- Re: autotools and ada
- [OT] VMS ODS-5 filesystems, was: Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Tasking and wxWidgets
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: greptree
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Uninitialized variable and the effects they have
- From: Wilhelm Spickermann
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Silly question about strings (was: Filenames in Ada)
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: GDB 2.8.1 defect
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Uninitialized variable and the effects they have
- Re: Silly question about strings
- Re: autotools and ada
- Uninitialized variable and the effects they have
- Re: Silly question about strings (was: Filenames in Ada)
- Re: GDB 2.8.1 defect
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- GDB 2.8.1 defect
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Silly question about strings (was: Filenames in Ada)
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Silly question about strings (was: Filenames in Ada)
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Back...from a long absence
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Back...from a long absence
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Filenames in Ada
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Filenames in Ada
- Re: Extended Return Statement with exception
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: autotools and ada
- Re: Extended Return Statement with exception
- Re: autotools and ada
- autotools and ada
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Re: Extended Return Statement with exception
- Re: How To Write Unmaintainable Code
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: Extended Return Statement with exception
- Re: Extended Return Statement with exception
- Re: Extended Return Statement with exception
- Re: Initialize with aggregate?
- Re: Initialize with aggregate?
- Extended Return Statement with exception
- How To Write Unmaintainable Code
- Re: Initialize with aggregate?
- Re: Initialize with aggregate?
- Re: greptree
- greptree
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Java exception model. Was: Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Java exception model. Was: Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Initialize with aggregate?
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Initialize with aggregate?
- Re: Initialize with aggregate?
- Initialize with aggregate?
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: redefinition of the operator
- Re: redefinition of the operator
- Re: redefinition of the operator
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: redefinition of the operator
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: redefinition of the operator
- Re: redefinition of the operator
- From: Francesco Bochicchio
- Re: redefinition of the operator
- From: Francesco Bochicchio
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: redefinition of the operator
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: redefinition of the operator
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- redefinition of the operator
- From: Francesco Bochicchio
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Debugger for GNAT
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Debugger for GNAT
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Don't use the "use" clause
- Re: Java exception model. Was: Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Java exception model. Was: Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Debugger for GNAT
- Re: Debugger for GNAT
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: Debugger for GNAT
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: Allocated aligned arrays
- From: jimmaureenrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Allocated aligned arrays
- Re: Debugger for GNAT
- Re: Debugger for GNAT
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Java exception model. Was: Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Debugger for GNAT
- Re: GENERIC SPEC TYPE ERROR
- Java exception model. Was: Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: How Dynamic Pages Are Indexed
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- How Dynamic Pages Are Indexed
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion ("_Type" suffix)
- Eclipse Ada Support - FYI
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Arrays & pointers question
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- From: jimmaureenrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Arrays & pointers question
- Re: Arrays & pointers question
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: GENERIC SPEC TYPE ERROR
- Re: GENERIC SPEC TYPE ERROR
- GENERIC SPEC TYPE ERROR
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Adaists Deny Acronym. (was: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?)
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Adaists Deny Acronym.
- Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Ada Quality and Style book discussion
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Adaists Deny Acronym. (was: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?)
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Arrays & pointers question
- Re: Arrays & pointers question
- Re: Arrays & pointers question
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Arrays & pointers question
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- From: jimmaureenrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Request for comments on simple Ada program
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?
- Re: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?
- Re: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?
- ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- More space programmes in trouble...
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Detecting version of installed GNAT
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] QtAda binding from Leonid Dulman
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Detecting version of installed GNAT
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Negative float problem
- [ANNOUNCE] QtAda binding from Leonid Dulman
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Buffer overflow Article - CACM
- Re: Detecting version of installed GNAT
- Re: Detecting version of installed GNAT
- Re: Detecting version of installed GNAT
- Re: Detecting version of installed GNAT
- Re: Detecting version of installed GNAT
- Detecting version of installed GNAT
- Re: New Ada ANSI console/X terminal game
- Re: function "&" for strings type cause memory problem.
- Re: "Limited with" usage
- Re: function "&" for strings type cause memory problem.
- "Limited with" usage
- Re: "Limited with" usage
- Re: function "&" for strings type cause memory problem.
- Re: function "&" for strings type cause memory problem.
- Re: function "&" for strings type cause memory problem.
- Re: function "&" for strings type cause memory problem.
- Re: function "&" for strings type cause memory problem.
- Re: function "&" for strings type cause memory problem.
- function "&" for strings type cause memory problem.
- Re: Dispatching operations
- Re: changing alignment of built-in boolean
- Re: New Ada ANSI console/X terminal game
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- From: brian . b . mcguinness
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- From: brian . b . mcguinness
- Re: New Ada space project
- Re: New Ada space project
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Q re floating point operations
- Re: Advice on abort
- From: Poul-Erik Andreasen
- Re: New Ada ANSI console/X terminal game
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: New Ada ANSI console/X terminal game
- Re: changing alignment of built-in boolean
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- From: Wilhelm Spickermann
- Re: 'Size can mean value size OR object size, depending..
- Re: Importing and using a C++ class in Ada. Pragma Cpp_Constructor, Cpp_Class
- Re: How does one find an Ada job?
- Re: 'Size can mean value size OR object size, depending..
- Re: changing alignment of built-in boolean
- Re: Q re floating point operations
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: New Ada space project
- 'Size can mean value size OR object size, depending..
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Q re floating point operations
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: New Ada ANSI console/X terminal game
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: Advice on abort
- Ada books (was: I don't know what the compiler wants to tell me)
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- From: Wilhelm Spickermann
- Re: New Ada ANSI console/X terminal game
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: Advice on abort
- From: Poul-Erik Andreasen
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Dispatching operations
- Re: Advice on abort
- Advice on Calendar.Time
- Re: Advice on abort
- From: Poul-Erik Andreasen
- Re: Advice on abort
- From: Poul-Erik Andreasen
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Dispatching operations
- Dispatching operations
- Ann. : new release of Cheddar, a free real time scheduling analyzer
- New Ada ANSI console/X terminal game
- Re: I don't know what the compiler wants to tell me
- Re: Correct use of variants
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Correct use of variants
- Re: Correct use of variants
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Advice on abort
- From: Poul-Erik Andreasen
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Correct use of variants
- Correct use of variants
- Re: I don't know what the compiler wants to tell me
- Re: pragma convention
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: pointer questions
- Re: pointer questions
- Re: pragma convention
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: pragma convention
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: ADA/C interfaces: type representations uncontrollable in C
- Re: ADA/C interfaces: type representations uncontrollable in C
- ADA/C interfaces: type representations uncontrollable in C
- pragma convention
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Bindings for high-performance vector x matrix multiplication libraries?
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Bindings for high-performance vector x matrix multiplication libraries?
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Desperatly trying to implement an mergesort algorithm
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Desperatly trying to implement an mergesort algorithm
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Re: I don't know what the compiler wants to tell me
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Advice on abort
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Desperatly trying to implement an mergesort algorithm
- Re: Desperatly trying to implement an mergesort algorithm
- Desperatly trying to implement an mergesort algorithm
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Advice on abort
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Multiple shared libraries with a single spec
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Re: I don't know what the compiler wants to tell me
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: pragma Convention ignored (sometimes)
- Re: I don't know what the compiler wants to tell me
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Re: Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Re: Gnat 3.15p pragma issues
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- pragma Convention ignored (sometimes)
- Re: Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Re: Gnat 3.15p pragma issues
- Re: I don't know what the compiler wants to tell me
- From: jimmaureenrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- I don't know what the compiler wants to tell me
- Re: 64bit machines
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: Gnat 3.15p pragma issues
- Re: Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Re: Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Re: Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Re: Gnat 3.15p pragma issues
- Discriminated types with default discriminants
- Gnat 3.15p pragma issues
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Re-exporting primitive operations of a private type (like "-", and 'min)
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades
- Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades
- Re: pointer questions
- Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades
- Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: pointer questions
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: pointer questions
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: pointer questions
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: Dynamic String
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
- Re: Re-exporting primitive operations of a private type (like "-", and 'min)
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Dynamic String
- From: Harald Korneliussen
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: pointer questions
- Re: Re-exporting primitive operations of a private type (like "-", and 'min)
- Re: not null access procedure (was: Re: Dynamic String)
- Re: pointer questions
- not null access procedure (was: Re: Dynamic String)
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Dynamic String
- Re: Re-exporting primitive operations of a private type (like "-", and 'min)
- Re: Dynamic String
- Re: Dynamic String
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Dynamic String
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Re-exporting primitive operations of a private type (like "-", and 'min)
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Negative float problem
- Re: Dynamic String
- Re: Dynamic String
- From: Harald Korneliussen
- Re: Re-exporting primitive operations of a private type (like "-", and 'min)
- Re: Re-exporting primitive operations of a private type (like "-", and 'min)
- Re: Simulation of fixed point in c WITH DIFFERENT BIT-WIDTH
