Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- From: Anonymous Coward <bogus_addy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 02:21:33 GMT
I'm interested in finding out what the default representation of a
record type is. Can I expect the sequence of elements in the default
representation to match the sequence they are defined in?
Pointers to where this information can be found would also be
appreciated, as Cohen's book and Google fail to answer this.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- From: Martin Krischik
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- From: Steve
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Prev by Date: pragma Convention ignored (sometimes)
- Next by Date: Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Previous by thread: I don't know what the compiler wants to tell me
- Next by thread: Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|