Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 04:45:44 GMT
Steve wrote:
I disagree with this conclusion. While I agree that 3.5.1 describes the relation between the representation values, it does not define the representation.
ARM 3.5.1 defines the position numbers, and ARM 13.4 specifies that the representation will be the same as the position numbers unless specified otherwise.
-- Jeff Carter "Have you gone berserk? Can't you see that that man is a ni?" Blazing Saddles 38 .
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- From: Anonymous Coward
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- From: Steve
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- From: Anonymous Coward
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- From: Steve
- Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Prev by Date: Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Next by Date: Bindings for high-performance vector x matrix multiplication libraries?
- Previous by thread: Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Next by thread: Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|