Re: autotools and ada
- From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:17:31 -0500
Jerome Hugues <hugues@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <uwtizy8kf.fsf@xxxxxxx>, Stephen Leake wrote:
>
>> To be fully useful with Ada, there needs to be a shared set of macros
>> written (in m4) for finding and executing GNAT tools (and/or other Ada
>> toolsets).
>
> You'll find some of them in Adasockets, PolyORB, XML/Ada (and possibly
> others) depending on your needs ..
Well, my point was that they need to be _shared_. By which I meant
"contributed to the autotools project, so _all_ Ada projects have
direct access to them".
I haven't looked, but it sounds like the Ada macros in the above
projects are all different from each other.
So the problem now is to get the various Ada projects that use
autotools to agree on a standard set of macros. Hmm, do you suppose
the ARG would accept that task :)?
--
-- Stephe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: autotools and ada
- From: Martin Dowie
- Re: autotools and ada
- From: Jerome Hugues
- Re: autotools and ada
- References:
- autotools and ada
- From: Ottavio Campana
- Re: autotools and ada
- From: Matthieu Moy
- Re: autotools and ada
- From: Pascal Obry
- Re: autotools and ada
- From: Stephen Leake
- Re: autotools and ada
- From: Jerome Hugues
- autotools and ada
- Prev by Date: Uninitialized variable and the effects they have
- Next by Date: Re: Silly question about strings
- Previous by thread: Re: autotools and ada
- Next by thread: Re: autotools and ada
- Index(es):