Re: autotools and ada
- From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:03:29 +0100
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 15:31 +0100, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> >>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey R Carter <spam@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Jeffrey> My experience, in over 21 yrs using Ada, is that make files
> Jeffrey> are unnecessary. I have never used them.
>
> Have your programs be installed on totally different target systems?
> At various location? Can they easily be cross-compiled? Can compiler
> flags be changed easily? Can you switch compilers easily?
>
> All this requires work and this work can be alleviated using
> autotools. Makefiles are not for compilation only.
This work can be alleviated in Unix(-like) environments only.
$ variable=`program1 | program2 'parameters'`
requires a specific flavor of process control, piping, availability
of program1 and program2. If the output of such constructs is
just some string identifying the systems, I can only think of this
as a kludge. autotools are that way throughout.
My suspicion is that people will hardly ever have a chance
of learning how to use their language to good effect to reduce
the need for configuration. Reason: autotools is popular and has
the well known seduction trick built in: Users think they don't
need to think.
-- Georg
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: autotools and ada
- From: Pascal Obry
- Re: autotools and ada
- References:
- autotools and ada
- From: Ottavio Campana
- Re: autotools and ada
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: autotools and ada
- From: Samuel Tardieu
- autotools and ada
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] VMS ODS-5 filesystems, was: Re: Filenames in Ada
- Next by Date: Re: Help installing GCC/GNAT 4.0.2
- Previous by thread: Re: autotools and ada
- Next by thread: Re: autotools and ada
- Index(es):