Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- From: "Lucretia" <lucretia9@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Nov 2005 02:37:59 -0800
> Not clear that inlining would help a lot here.
To avoid the actual function calls (of which the bodies are tiny),
makes the binary slightly bigger, but then that's teh tradeoff, isn't
it?
> What would be acceptable? Using a Lock from the Booch çcomponents
> (http://booch95.sourceforge.net) takes just under 20 us on a 1.5GHz
> Powerbook.
I really doubt that the Booch components are written any differently to
mine. So, why would I need to?
Thanks,
Luke.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- From: Simon Wright
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- References:
- Tasking and wxWidgets
- From: Lucretia
- Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- From: Simon Wright
- Tasking and wxWidgets
- Prev by Date: Ada at FOSDEM 2006
- Next by Date: Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Previous by thread: Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Next by thread: Re: Tasking and wxWidgets
- Index(es):