Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:42:56 -0000
Stephen Leake wrote:
>> Right. The OP might want to use SPARK, which does not have use
>> clauses.
>
> That seems odd. What does SPARK gain by outlawing use clauses? Surely
> the examiner can handle the extra name resolution!
But the human reader can't handle the extra name resolution! :-)
Cheers
-- Martin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- From: Peter Amey
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- From: Stephen Leake
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- References:
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- From: adaworks
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- From: Stephen Leake
- Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Prev by Date: Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Next by Date: Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Previous by thread: Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Next by thread: Re: Don't use the "use" clause
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|