Re: Type safety on wikipedia
- From: Martin Krischik <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:10:24 +0100
Alex R. Mosteo wrote:
> Martin Krischik wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I found this interesting article on Wikipedia which made me think a
>> bit:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_safety
>>
>> Do have a look at the talk page as well.
>
> After reading that I'm not sure how Ada can be type safe if unchecked
> deallocation is a common way of implementing relatively common tasks as
> linked lists and so. The explicit example given for "type unsafety" is
> easily doable in Ada.
That is my thinking as well.
> But I acknowledge that I'm new to the topic, anyone can explain?
The Wikipage describes a stricter rule to the term "type save" then most Ada
programmer would think. Have we been wrong or is this rule to strict to be
practical. Mind you academics never cared for practical.
And I have allways been an advocate for GC and this proves me somehow.
Martin
--
mailto://krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com
.
- References:
- Type safety on wikipedia
- From: Martin Krischik
- Re: Type safety on wikipedia
- From: Alex R. Mosteo
- Type safety on wikipedia
- Prev by Date: Re: Type safety on wikipedia
- Next by Date: Re: Ada to C++ translator
- Previous by thread: Re: Type safety on wikipedia
- Next by thread: Re: Type safety on wikipedia
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|