Re: Records that could be arrays
- From: Wilhelm Spickermann <zhopi.20.unbenutzbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:34:11 +0100
Hi,
Stephen Leake wrote:
Wilhelm Spickermann <zhopi.20.unbenutzbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Thats right; it's no argument, I shouldn't have added the last
writes:
This becomes also visible in the missing loop statements in
typical polar coordinate operations. And it would be rather
unusual for an array to have a special equality definition
Perhaps it is "unusual" in your experience because you are
overly restrictive in using arrays for such types.
sentence. It's just an implication of my preferences of using
records for such structures.
Wilhelm
.
- References:
- Records that could be arrays
- From: Justin Gombos
- Re: Records that could be arrays
- From: Wilhelm Spickermann
- Re: Records that could be arrays
- From: Justin Gombos
- Re: Records that could be arrays
- From: Wilhelm Spickermann
- Re: Records that could be arrays
- From: Stephen Leake
- Records that could be arrays
- Prev by Date: Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Re: help with include and library files in GPS
- Previous by thread: Re: Records that could be arrays
- Next by thread: Re: Records that could be arrays
- Index(es):