Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:05:47 +0100
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:34:58 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:07:00 GMT, Matthew Heaney wrote:
Write your algorithms in terms of sequences of elements instead of containers,
and you can forget about containers.
No, thanks. If I wished that sort of untyped design, there would be C++ and
dynamically typed languages at my disposal. I don't want untyped
containers. I would keep boxes for apples and barrels for herrings in
separate rooms.
What kind of operations on containers do you have in mind,
as opposed to operations focussing on their elements?
1. Passing as a parameter
2. Copying
3. Merging
4. Slicing
5. Closures and simultaneous traversal of two or more containers
6. Relational operations on sets of containers
....
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Matthew Heaney
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- References:
- limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Thierry Bernier
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Randy Brukardt
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Matthew Heaney
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Matthew Heaney
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Matthew Heaney
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- Prev by Date: Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Re: help with include and library files in GPS
- Previous by thread: Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- Next by thread: Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|