where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'

From: "Ananth the Boss" <anboss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 23 Apr 2006 21:19:16 -0700

we are developing safety critical software.my seniors say that c and
c++ are not suitable for safety critical software development and ada
is very much safe.NASA aslo uses Ada.at what point c++ or c turns to be
not suitable for devleloping flight software. i may be wrong also. can
any one give some more justifications for telling "ADA is safe" thanks
in advance

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
  - From: Steve
- Re: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
  - From: Rod Chapman
- Re: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
  - From: jimmaureenrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: n versioning is there any other better approach
Next by Date: Re: n versioning
Previous by thread: n versioning
Next by thread: Re: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: ada IDE
... If you are doing safety critical software (assuming you mean something ... like DO-178b level a or b) then the IDE is really secondary to the ... If you select something like Greenhills Ada with the Integrity OS then it ... BAE Systems/DDC-I ...
(comp.lang.ada)
Re: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru
... c++ are not suitable for safety critical software development and ada ... is very much safe.NASA aslo uses Ada.at what point c++ or c turns to be ... any one give some more justifications for telling "ADA is safe" thanks ...
(comp.lang.ada)
ada IDE
... we are involved in development of safety critical software for flight ... can ny one say which is the best IDE for ADA for development of ...
(comp.lang.ada)