Re: n versioning
- From: Jeffrey Creem <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:26:46 -0400
Ananth the Boss wrote:
thanks to all for ur interst in helping me.in my case the problem spec
is the same and the problem is independantly developed by three
different groups in three different languages. instead of coding the
same problem thrice in three different programming languages; is there
any approach like UML so that we can develop software models and from
that the code can be generated automatically?
If the thought is to start from UML and generate (automatically) three different code models in 3 different programming languages I think you are really missing the point.
You will still just have one UML model which, if it contains flaws will almost certainly be present in all of the generated code.
At this point, I am having a hard time trying to really understand the purpose of these posts. They are too mild to be a troll but at the same time, the thought that a group has been hired to write safety critical software with no experience at all and an apparent inability to use google is pretty scary.
I can only hope you switch to something like C++ and whatever the application is far enough away from me and my family so that when it fails, nothing that I care about gets hurt.
I hesitate to post such a mean spirited reply but unless this is just some sort of an academic exercise, it really does seem like an accident waiting to happen.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: n versioning
- From: Ananth the Boss
- Re: n versioning
- References:
- n versioning
- From: Ananth the Boss
- n versioning
- Prev by Date: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
- Next by Date: Re: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
- Previous by thread: n versioning
- Next by thread: Re: n versioning
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
