Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Jean-Pierre Rosen <rosen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:17:58 +0200
Ananth the Boss a écrit :
i am working in Ada based flight software development project.as aThere is no sin in not being object-oriented, it all depends on your needs. Especially in real-time, procedural approaches are often better when ensuring WCET is important.
means of improving i took to the CASE tool based development.ours is a
procedural approach of development.but the commercial CASE tools speak
a lot about class/object/UML.how will this suit for procedure oriented
development where we dont have necessity to identify classes and do
detailed design as mentioned in OO aproach
UML is an object oriented approach, and is not appropriate for procedural development. Other tools supporting SART for example might be more appropriate.
The need must be lead the choice of the tool, not the other way round!
--
---------------------------------------------------------
J-P. Rosen (rosen@xxxxxxxxx)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- References:
- procedural vs object oriented
- From: Ananth the Boss
- procedural vs object oriented
- Prev by Date: procedural vs object oriented
- Next by Date: Re: procedural vs object oriented
- Previous by thread: procedural vs object oriented
- Next by thread: Re: procedural vs object oriented
- Index(es):