Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: "bh" <no-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:33:04 -0400
"Ananth the Boss" <anboss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146039364.130635.181590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
i am working in Ada based flight software development project.as a
means of improving i took to the CASE tool based development.ours is a
procedural approach of development.but the commercial CASE tools speak
a lot about class/object/UML.how will this suit for procedure oriented
development where we dont have necessity to identify classes and do
detailed design as mentioned in OO aproach
If you don't _know_ how to do good OO with Ada, I'd recommend against it.
We tried a project using OO and I think it is pretty safe to say we didn't
get what we were hoping for. I think your results will be better with
procedural.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- References:
- procedural vs object oriented
- From: Ananth the Boss
- procedural vs object oriented
- Prev by Date: Re: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
- Next by Date: Re: procedural vs object oriented
- Previous by thread: Re: procedural vs object oriented
- Next by thread: Re: procedural vs object oriented
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|