Re: procedural vs object oriented

"bh" <no-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
"Ananth the Boss" <anboss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146039364.130635.181590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
i am working in Ada based flight software development project.as a
means of improving i took to the CASE tool based development.ours is a
procedural approach of development.but the commercial CASE tools speak
a lot about class/object/UML.how will this suit for procedure oriented
development where we dont have necessity to identify classes and do
detailed design as mentioned in OO aproach


If you don't _know_ how to do good OO with Ada, I'd recommend against it.
We tried a project using OO and I think it is pretty safe to say we didn't
get what we were hoping for. I think your results will be better with
procedural.

According to Robert Dewar during FOSDEM, nobody uses OOP in avionics
software, because the uncertainty inherent to dynamic dispatching
hinders certification. Is someone on this newsgroup in a position to
give a counter-example?

--
Ludovic Brenta.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: procedural vs object oriented
    ... means of improving i took to the CASE tool based development.ours is a ... procedural approach of development.but the commercial CASE tools speak ... Ada is a nice language. ... You'd probably need less tools when working in Ada, ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: procedural vs object oriented
    ... means of improving i took to the CASE tool based development.ours is a ... procedural approach of development.but the commercial CASE tools speak ... If you don't _know_ how to do good OO with Ada, I'd recommend against it. ... We tried a project using OO and I think it is pretty safe to say we didn't ...
    (comp.lang.ada)