Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation
- From: Maciej Sobczak <no.spam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:08:53 +0200
REH wrote:
http://www.msobczak.com/prog/typegen/
You maybe interested in a C++ class that I wrote.
Been there, done that:
http://www.msobczak.com/prog/downloads.html
(see safetypes.tar.gz and range.tar.gz)
I have dropped this idea because I think that the external code generator is much more flexible and more powerful with regard to the type safety that can be gained. Range checking is just one little part of what is needed. Template classes are fine if you can afford limiting yourself only to this little part, but that's not usually the case.
--
Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/
Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation
- From: REH
- Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation
- From: REH
- Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation
- From: REH
- Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation
- References:
- Type safety, C++ and code generation
- From: Maciej Sobczak
- Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation
- From: REH
- Type safety, C++ and code generation
- Prev by Date: Re: procedural vs object oriented
- Next by Date: Re: procedural vs object oriented
- Previous by thread: Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation
- Next by thread: Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation
- Index(es):