Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:11:41 +0200
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Alex R. Mosteo writes:(interesting snip)
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
In general-purpose programming, you can use all the features of the
language that help you write your source code faster; in avionics, you
only use those that help you certify your machine code faster. It
matters more to reduce the cost of certification than the cost of
writing the software, because the former far outweighs the latter.
Thanks, the issue is very clear now.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- References:
- procedural vs object oriented
- From: Ananth the Boss
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: bh
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Alex R. Mosteo
- Re: procedural vs object oriented
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- procedural vs object oriented
- Prev by Date: Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation
- Next by Date: Re: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
- Previous by thread: Re: procedural vs object oriented
- Next by thread: Re: procedural vs object oriented
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|