Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation

brian.b.mcguinness@xxxxxxxx wrote:

One solution to the problem would be to provide a new keyword for
defining types with no default operations. Only the operations you
explicitly defined would be available.

You mean like "limited private"?

--
Jeff Carter
"Blessed is just about anyone with a vested interest in the status quo."
Monty Python's Life of Brian
73
.

Relevant Pages