Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Martin Krischik <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:38:11 +0200
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
The change of
license has no effect on corporations large enough to use GNAT Pro, or
on students, hobbyists, or free software developers.
Does it? The GPL is viral and booch, charles, AdaCL - all currently GMGPL
would need to to relicensed to GPL now to be used with with GNAT/GPL.
AdaCL at least produced licence-warnings when compiled with GNAT/GPL. While
licence warning are not legal the at least shows how AdaCore sees things.
And this would mean that those libs become unavailable to closed source
users.
Martin
PS: Just in case you have not seen any warnings so far: all package
specifications copied from the RM come with licence "unrestricted" and they
are free in all respects. Only when you use a packaged not mentioned inside
the RM the warning pops up.
--
mailto://krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Stephen Leake
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Simon Wright
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: M E Leypold
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- References:
- Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Jeffrey Creem
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- Prev by Date: Re: Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- Next by Date: Re: Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- Previous by thread: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Next by thread: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|