Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Simon Wright <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:26:20 +0100
"Martin Krischik" <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In the absence of pragma License GNAT scans the commens for magic words
which indicate the lincence used ;-) . As it is the BC will be
considered GMGPL by GNAT. But since no GNAT specific packages are used
no licence warnings are issued.
I added the notice the BCs use to a unit which withs GNAT.IO (and which
gives the warning with pragma License (Modified_GPL)). No warnings
(the 2005 edition).
.
- References:
- Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Jeffrey Creem
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Martin Krischik
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: M E Leypold
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Simon Wright
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Martin Krischik
- Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- Prev by Date: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Next by Date: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Previous by thread: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Next by thread: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|