Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:18:13 +0200
Preben Randhol writes:
Georg Bauhaus wrote on 27/06/2006 (20:50) :
So the release of a modified GtkAda may drop the
exception without consulting the originators.
I can't say whether or not the members of the above list
like the new facts.
I don't like it. I contributed to a GMGPL project not a pure GPL
project.
If you are one of the authors, and you happen to have a copy of the
software, then I believe it is your right to distribute it under a new
license or under the GMGPL.
One big question though. What is /where can on find the license of
the gcc - GNU Compiler Collection?
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
The tarballs are crypto-signed and contain a COPYING file and headers.
If you're still not sure about the license terms, ask the people who
crypto-signed the archive.
Does the gcc have an exception so one can make non-GPL programs with it?
Yes, both in libstdc++ and libgnat.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Preben Randhol
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- References:
- Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Jeffrey Creem
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: M E Leypold
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Preben Randhol
- Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- Prev by Date: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Next by Date: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Previous by thread: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Next by thread: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Index(es):