Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:53:27 -0400
"Martin Krischik" <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Georg Bauhaus wrote:
The GMGPL is certainly GPL compatible.
No they are not. Look at this simple code sniplet:
with GNAT.OS_Lib;
package My_OS_Lib
package Pass_Thrue renames GNAT.OS_Lib;
end My_OS_Lib;
I used a rename to make shure the problem is exposed.
What, exactly, are you trying to say here?
The GMGPL license is GPL compatible; see
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
That means you can use GMGPL source code in a project that also has
GPL source code; the license for the total project must be GPL.
Even if you run into a pragma License(some invalid identifier),
you just create a derivative work by placing '--' before the
pragma. Just make sure that the result, if distributed, is
distributed as required by the GPL.
Right: My work has to become GPL as well.
If you distribute binaries compiled with the GNAT GPL compiler, that
is true.
--
-- Stephe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Jeffrey Creem
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- References:
- Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Jeffrey Creem
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Martin Krischik
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- From: Martin Krischik
- Ada in Debian: most libraries will switch to the pure GPL in Etch
- Prev by Date: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Next by Date: Re: How would I determine the contents of a directory
- Previous by thread: Re: No relicense everything now! (was: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?)
- Next by thread: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|