Re: Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0
- From: Björn Persson <spam-away@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:42:19 GMT
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Björn Persson a écrit :· They think all the license statements in the packages accurately reflect
the license you get.
Neither reply you posted from Cyrille Comar supports that point of
view; he never mentioned the license statements in the packages, in
fact.
Then you missed this sentence: "We believe [...] that the packages available for download contain the proper GPL statements in the format advised by the FSF."
The sentence after that, "If it is not the case, please let us know, this is most probably an error and we will be happy to fix it.", must mean that they think the statements are the way they want them to be.
By the way, regarding that mention of "proper GPL statements", it should be noted that even GMGPL code contains all the GPL statements that pure-GPL code contains.
--
Björn Persson PGP key A88682FD
omb jor ers @sv ge.
r o.b n.p son eri nu
.
- References:
- Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0
- From: M E Leypold
- Re: Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0
- From: Björn Persson
- Re: Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Ada2005 in August's CrossTalk
- Next by Date: Subtype conformance... not what I was expecting.
- Previous by thread: Re: Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0
- Next by thread: Re: Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0
- Index(es):