Re: Ripple effect
- From: "Adam Beneschan" <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Aug 2006 11:22:00 -0700
Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
I recall that during the Ada-9X revision process, it was proposed that
primitive operators of a type have this kind of visibility. IIRC, one of
the reasons that this was not accepted was that it would lead to Ripple
effects: adding or removing a unit from a context clause could change
one legal program to a different legal program.
This has nothing to do with the topic. But my understanding is that
the Beaujolais effect was named because Jean Ichbiah offered a bottle
of Beaujolais wine to anyone who could find a certain anomaly in the
language. So are you saying that if someone finds a Ripple effect,
you're going to offer them a bottle of .... ???
Aaahh... I don't even think they sell it any more.
-- Adam
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ripple effect
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: Ripple effect
- References:
- Ripple effect
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Ripple effect
- Prev by Date: Re: protected type interrupts
- Next by Date: Re: call procedure in Linux-Ada-module from "normal" program
- Previous by thread: Re: Ripple effect
- Next by thread: Re: Ripple effect
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|