Re: Ripple effect
- From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:39:14 GMT
Maciej Sobczak wrote:
Why?
If you remove some use clause that might affect the visibility of some primitive operation, then it will also remove the whole type that is involved in a given expression, rendering the whole as illegal.
Could you provide a short example of this Ripple effect?
No. I'm simply aware that STT cites direct operator visibility as potentially giving rise to the Ripple effect in the Ada FAQ
http://www.adapower.com/index.php?Command=Class&ClassID=FAQ&CID=358
--
Jeff Carter
"Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
07
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ripple effect
- From: Maciej Sobczak
- Re: Ripple effect
- References:
- Ripple effect
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: Ripple effect
- From: Maciej Sobczak
- Ripple effect
- Prev by Date: Re: [SPARK] Code safety and information hiding
- Next by Date: Re: Ripple effect
- Previous by thread: Re: Ripple effect
- Next by thread: Re: Ripple effect
- Index(es):