Re: protected type interrupts


"Jean-Pierre Rosen" <rosen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mf6mce.8k2.ln@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
But since you specified a priority for the PO (and assuming
priority_ceiling), you still execute at interrupt priority. Depending on
the hardware and how priorities are managed, this may delay or hide actual
interrupts.


Are you saying it may be better not to specify a priority?

REH


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: protected type interrupts
    ... you still execute at interrupt priority. ... Depending on the hardware and how priorities are managed, this may delay or hide actual interrupts. ... If your compiler doesn't use priority_ceiling by default (and you didn't specify it), ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: Thick Geordie bastards
    ... >deliveries, for priority cases only. ... >and announced that the Shell garage down the road had fuel now. ... >Someone else said, with a grin: "You mean, we drew up the list saying ... I salute the impartial fair-mindedness of the bloke who drew it up, ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • RE: Compiling C++ modules
    ... Or verify that the code operates ... performance was the number one priority because ... Certainly, very low-level kernel code ... I am not saying that the use of C++ over C is likely to improve ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Finding out case details?
    ... Protectiing what remains of the victim's dignity and privacy is a higher ... priority. ... so are you saying that such records of a person's ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Finding out case details?
    ... Protectiing what remains of the victim's dignity and privacy is a higher ... priority. ... so are you saying that such records of a person's ...
    (uk.legal)