Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server



Pascal Obry <pascal@xxxxxxxx> writes:
Well, well! Tracking merges is planed for version 2.0. We need to give
time to Subversion. It used to be a CVS "like" project for compatibility
issued. Subversion 2.0 is on the way and the developers are going to do
things as it should have been done now... So Subversion 2.0 will
probably break compatibility with current version for good!

Let's not dismiss such a nice tool so easily ;)

You're kidding, right? If it takes them 4 versions (or more) and a
major compatibility-breaking rewrite to get things "as [they] should
have been done", then I don't see how Subversion is "a nice tool".

--
Ludovic Brenta.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Versioning CVS or RCS
    ... >> opted the creation of subversion. ... >> developers) haven't fixed it. ... >on CVS in their spare time, and they don't think the problems are ... to make major architectural changes. ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: Controlling project version
    ... over CVS. ... I've used CVS and Subversion quite a lot for a number of years. ... The branching in Subversion is a gazillion times better than CVS if you ... started playing with Git. ...
    (php.general)
  • Re: Xcode and Subversion
    ... Subversion aims to be a 'better CVS than CVS'. ... All CVS and Subversion clients access a master ... repository: changes are committed to the repository by one client, ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Alternatives to Visual Sourcesafe?
    ... I would say that subversion exists for those that can't set up CVS. ... other major projects using it :-) It's a mature product. ... run a CVS server on a laptop - in fact - it is running right now on the laptop I'm using to type this ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: (OT) Team programming tools
    ... > people, we have 5 programmers, including me. ... Visual Source Safe, CVS, and Subversion to this point. ... Linux is not The Answer. ...
    (Debian-User)