Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- From: Martin Krischik <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:40:08 +0200
Ludovic Brenta schrieb:
I find it interesting in Monotone you can commit changes even if your
tree is not up-to-date, so you only commit your changes first go, and
then you do the merge. As opposed to being forced to do both in the
one commit (I never liked this model).
That's funny because it took me a little while to get used to the
"commit first, merge then" model. I wasn't used to it. Now I like it
quite a lot.
That's exactly was I was always looking for. I just hate how most vcs force me to mess up my perfectly good code by forcing me to merge when I am not yet ready for merge. Worse: I won't have a backup copy of the pre-merge code.
Yes, those vcs will mess up my working copy with ".#" files - but that is not the same as having a backup inside the repository.
The other option I am often missing is a "golden code" option. What I have prepared inside the working copy is right and propper - no merge needed - thank you very much.
Martin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- From: Brian May
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- References:
- ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- From: Pascal Obry
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- From: Brian May
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- From: Ludovic Brenta
- ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- Prev by Date: Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- Next by Date: Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- Previous by thread: Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- Next by thread: Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|