Re: Multitasking and containers

"Matthew Heaney" <mheaney@xxxxxxx> writes:

Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:

I guess we have different interpretations of "delicate handmade work". I
took it simply to mean custom implementations tailored to the specific
project (such as a container that does not need protection for reads).

But that's the same as saying you can not use anything in the
predefined library. If so then the container library is the least of
your problems!

If the predefined library doesn't meet your needs you do indeed have a
lot of work ahead of you; often small beer in the overall scope (eg,
safety-related systems with SIL4 software => no runtime at all [GNAT
high integrity edition for example] highly desirable if not absolutely
necessary precondition for certification).

But if it does meet your needs you're crazy not to use it!
.