Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:31:13 +0100
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 09:50 +0100, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:19:55 GMT, Matthew Heaney wrote:
It is easy to imagine a
situation (massively parallel computing with shared memory) where the loss
could be huge.
I have learned that Ada tasking is defined at a relatively
high level. Suppose you are writing highly specialized low
level software, such as when taking advantage of a specific
computer's architecture at the system or hardware level.
It is easy for me to imagine that you are working way below
Ada's tasking level. Are you suggesting that this is the
normal mode of using a high level programming language
that supports tasking?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- References:
- Multitasking and containers
- From: Maciej Sobczak
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Maciej Sobczak
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Matthew Heaney
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Matthew Heaney
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Dr. Adrian Wrigley
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Matthew Heaney
- Re: Multitasking and containers
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Multitasking and containers
- Prev by Date: Re: Multitasking and containers
- Next by Date: Re: Multitasking and containers
- Previous by thread: Re: Multitasking and containers
- Next by thread: Re: Multitasking and containers
- Index(es):