Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:08:32 +0100
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:18:34 -0500, Robert A Duff wrote:
[...]
I claim that we're just arguing over
terminology: saying "so-and-so are different types, but there are all
kinds of implicit conversions" amounts to roughly the same thing as
"so-and-so are the same type".
As for terminology, I'd propose to call the latter "subtypes" and the
former "unrelated types."
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.
- References:
- Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: mark
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: (see below)
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: (see below)
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: Robert A Duff
- Easy question about Character manipulation
- Prev by Date: Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- Next by Date: Re: Interfacing with C - pointer problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- Next by thread: Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|