Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: "(see below)" <yaldnif.w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:02:15 +0000
On 31/1/07 18:11, in article NZ4wh.374843$1i1.113582@attbi_s72, "Jeffrey R.
Carter" <jrcarter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
When I learned Pascal (not ISO), my understanding was that
type
A = 1 .. 3;
was called a subrange, and defined A as what Ada calls a subtype of
Integer. Since
B = 1 .. 3;
was another subtype of the same type (in Ada terms), assignment between
them was no problem.
That is the practical effect, but it is not what the formal semantics
actually says. And, of course, there is more to type than assignment.
--
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk
.
- References:
- Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: mark
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: (see below)
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: (see below)
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: Robert A Duff
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: (see below)
- Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Easy question about Character manipulation
- Prev by Date: Re: Structured exception information
- Next by Date: Re: Binding or not binding
- Previous by thread: Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- Next by thread: Re: Easy question about Character manipulation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|