comp.lang.ada
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error
- AW: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => CompilerError
- From: Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not? => Compiler Error
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not?
- Unary operator after binary operator: legal or not?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Re: Pointers explained?
- Pointers explained?
- Pointers explained?
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Workqueues in Ada
- Workqueues in Ada
- Re: Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Re: Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Re: Getting current date and time
- From: Wilhelm Spickermann
- Re: Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Re: Can anybody send me a copy of ADA 95...!!!
- Re: Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Re: Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Re: Can anybody send me a copy of ADA 95...!!!
- Can anybody tell me where I can found a ADA 95 sources on the net ...!!
- Looking for ADA Programmers with UML design skills and 2-8 yrs exp.for Thales, Chennai
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Ada.Numerics.Generic_Real_Arrays: Problem with Transpose
- Ada.Numerics.Generic_Real_Arrays: Problem with Transpose
- Re: Can anybody send me a copy of ADA 95...!!!
- Re: Just a thought!
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Problems with dynamic allocation in tasks
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Does 3.9.3(10) apply to untagged private whose full view is tagged?
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Can anybody send me a copy of Ada 95...!!!
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Can anybody send me a copy of ADA 95...!!!
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Does 3.9.3(10) apply to untagged private whose full view is tagged?
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: Thanks Guys: Re: Predefined Packages
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Does 3.9.3(10) apply to untagged private whose full view is tagged?
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- AW: Does 3.9.3(10) apply to untagged private whose full view is tagged?
- From: Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Does 3.9.3(10) apply to untagged private whose full view is tagged?
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Re: Problems with dynamic allocation in tasks
- Re: Factory Pattern
- Factory Pattern
- Re: Problems with dynamic allocation in tasks
- Re: Problems with dynamic allocation in tasks
- Re: Problems with dynamic allocation in tasks
- Problems with dynamic allocation in tasks
- Re: AW: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: AW: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Recursive parameters in generics
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Just a thought!
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- AW: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- From: Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Just a thought!
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- AW: Getting current date and time
- From: Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Just a thought!
- AW: Recursive parameters in generics
- From: Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: ping comp.lang.ada
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Default value for a record component
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Public Ada Courses 27-31 Aug in Carlsbad CA
- Re: Recursive parameters in generics
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Default value for a record component
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Recursive parameters in generics
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- [Announcing] Public Ada Courses 27-31 Aug in Carlsbad CA
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Default value for a record component
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Recursive parameters in generics
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Recursive parameters in generics
- Re: Default value for a record component
- Re: Recursive parameters in generics
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Default value for a record component
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Recursive parameters in generics
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: ping comp.lang.ada
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: How to get the application path
- Re: ping comp.lang.ada
- Re: ping comp.lang.ada
- Re: ping comp.lang.ada
- ping comp.lang.ada
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- How to get the application path
- Re: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Getting current date and time
- Re: Default value for a record component
- Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Getting current date and time
- Re: Default value for a record component
- Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Re: Default value for a record component
- E-MEDISYS 2007 . Fez , Morocco , October 24-26, 2007
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Default value for a record component
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Default value for a record component
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Full-featured free Ada 95/2005 compiler?
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: Full-featured free Ada 95/2005 compiler?
- Re: Full-featured free Ada 95/2005 compiler?
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: how to get the compile time of an ada program with gnat
- Re: how to get the compile time of an ada program with gnat
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: how to get the compile time of an ada program with gnat
- how to get the compile time of an ada program with gnat
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Where is AdaGPGME (and others)
- Re: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- LLVM--Low Level Virtual Machine--and Ada
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: Empty "Programming in Ada 2005" CD-ROM?
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Re: Empty "Programming in Ada 2005" CD-ROM?
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: Empty "Programming in Ada 2005" CD-ROM?
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Re: Empty "Programming in Ada 2005" CD-ROM?
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Annonce: QtAda 0.1.1
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Empty "Programming in Ada 2005" CD-ROM?
- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- ANN: Units of measurement for Ada v2.4
- Re: Help writing ada booting kernel
- Help writing ada booting kernel
- Re: Full-featured free Ada 95/2005 compiler?
- Re: Full-featured free Ada 95/2005 compiler?
- Re: WG: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Full-featured free Ada 95/2005 compiler?
- Re: WG: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: WG: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: New open source UML tool including Ada support
- New open source UML tool including Ada support
- Re: WG: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: WG: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- From: jimmaureenrogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Translating C++ class types into Ada tagged types?
- Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- Re: WG: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- reply to article in EE Times
- Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- Re: WG: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- WG: SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- From: Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)
- Re: Pragma Suppress for Bit_Order warnings
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: Pragma Suppress for Bit_Order warnings
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: Pragma Suppress for Bit_Order warnings
- Pragma Suppress for Bit_Order warnings
- Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- SI Units - has Ada missed the boat?
- Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- ANN: GtkAda contributions v1.7
- AdaControl 1.7 released
- Re: Self pointer in limited record
- Re: Self pointer in limited record
- Re: Self pointer in limited record
- Re: Self pointer in limited record
- Re: Self pointer in limited record
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Self pointer in limited record
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: To program RS-485
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- From: Harald Korneliussen
- Re: To program RS-485
- Re: To program RS-485
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- To program RS-485
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- From: Harald Korneliussen
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent limitation
- Re: access types
- Re: Bus error
- Re: Bus error
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Konada.Db
- ANNOUNCE: Konada.Db
- Re: Bus error
- Re: access types
- Re: Bus error
- Re: Bus error
- Re: access types
- Re: Bus error
- Re: access types
- Re: Bus error
- Re: access types
- Re: pragma Pack does not work on GNAT 5.01a for Redhat Linux.
- Re: Bus error
- Re: Bus error
- Re: access types
- Re: access types
- Re: String literals and wide_string literals - how?
- Re: Ada Interfaces and the Liskov Substitution Principle
- access types
- Re: Bus error
