Re: Factory Pattern
- From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh+bauhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:40:43 +0200
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 23:44 -0700, Maciej Sobczak wrote:
On 26 Lip, 02:51, "Jeffrey R. Carter"
<spam.jrcarter....@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would think that an enumeration type would be better than Integer for
selecting among a few choices. Using Integer probably reflects C/++
thinking.
No. C and C++ have enumerations.
Like all well designed languages, Ada is not case sensitive.
Careful. It is a question of interpretation of any given character set
and it can be different with different tools, and there are many.
Many case sensitive tools seem to be inspired by the case sensitive 7bit
tools, and the case sensitive programmers, used in creating them.
In addition, being case-insensitive and at the same time allowing full
Unicode in identifiers is kind of schisophreny.
Why is being case-insensitive and allowing full Unicode
in identifiers schizophrenic?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Factory Pattern
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Factory Pattern
- References:
- Factory Pattern
- From: shaunpatterson
- Re: Factory Pattern
- From: Jeffrey R. Carter
- Re: Factory Pattern
- From: Maciej Sobczak
- Factory Pattern
- Prev by Date: Re: Reserve_Capacity for Unbounded_String?
- Next by Date: Re: Does 3.9.3(10) apply to untagged private whose full view is tagged?
- Previous by thread: Re: Factory Pattern
- Next by thread: Re: Factory Pattern
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|